Kindle Paperwhite VS Kobo Glo: Screen Contrast Comparison [closed]

Question

The two e-readers are almost evenly matched in the physical features department. The only variable left out is the quality of the screens.

Both have great support structures (e-book stores) that may differ between several countries around the world (in my own country, the Kobo has two online stores that sell localized - translated - ebooks, while the amazon is rather lacking).

So I am going to compare only the devices technical specs.

Pros for each one (mostly taken from here):

Kobo Glo:  

28g lighter (13% lighter than Kindle)
9mm shorter
has Micro SD slot
dedicated light switch button

vs

Kindle Paperwhite  

1mm thinner
USB mass storage (can connect to thumb drives?)
has a 3G version (I won't get a 3G e-reader though, but as reference)
WHITE E-PAPER DISPLAY

Now, the real question is:

I had not the opportunity to put both devices side-by-side in front of me to test their screens. What is the contrast ratio on those two devices?

Bonus points if answer points me to tech sheets with the contrast info.

Answer 1

The Paperwhite uses a Carta e-ink screen with a contrast ratio of 15:1 however, here's a German test that says the contrast actually is 12:1 (assuming Google translate was accurate -- my German is horrible). It has comparisons with other models, too.

The Kobo Glo uses a Pearl screen with a contrast radio of 10:1

Here is an older comparison of the two models that puts the Kindle Paperwhite's contrast ratio at 11.5:1

Also, in terms of lending Kobos are compatible with library lending systems.

Answer 2

EDITED TO CORRECT WRONG INFORMATION:

The question is between e-ink Pearl and Carta.

Here's some screenshots illustrating the difference:

http://blog.the-ebook-reader.com/2013/11/11/screen-comparison-e-ink-carta-vs-e-ink-pearl/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_Ink

As I pointed out already, the improvements with each generation of e-ink were significant in the naughts, but are less significant now.

Focusing too much on HW specs and not on human factors is a tendency that all geeks are sometimes guilty of.

BTW, e-ink displays are still great and affordable. People have always predicted that LED tablets will make e-ink irrelevant, but e-ink devices are still useful and affordable. (My only regret is that after the Nook Simple Touch, the vendors have eliminated hard buttons to turn the page). My main "usability" problem on my current Kindle Touch is that I accidentally tap on the surface to cause the page to advance...

Answer 3

This is really an opinion question, but I can offer my superficial thoughts:

1. Amazon has more free titles and lending capabilities (with Overdrive, etc). It's nice to have the cloud just deliver these things. I know you say that you don't care about the e-store, but prices on Amazon in USA are generally lower and discounted more often.

2. SD cards let you store a lot more books than the Kindle does.

3. Previously Kindle e-ink devices had an inferior format (and often looked like crap), but they updated the format after releasing the Kindle Fire. Kobo glo can read epubs -- though I don't think any epub3 features.

Both devices are basically in the same class of readers, and the technical differences between them are not significant. I suspect that Kindle would have better software running on it though and better add ons (dictionary, notetaking, social features, etc). Each generation of e-ink displays touts small differences, but I don't think they are not important at this point. (You could probably look it up, but refresh rates have improved a lot on the Kindle and probably Kobo too.

I would choose the Kobo over the Kindle if and only if:

1)I mainly bought DRM free titles and read a lot of public domain stuff AND 2)the price on the Kobo was more than 25% cheaper than the Kindle.

One more thing: avoid the Special Offers Kindles. They really take up too much space on the home page.