Skip to main content
30 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Mar 10, 2014 at 15:57 history suggested DᴀʀᴛʜVᴀᴅᴇʀ
added tag to question
Mar 10, 2014 at 15:28 answer added gnasher729 timeline score: 0
Mar 10, 2014 at 14:28 review Suggested edits
S Mar 10, 2014 at 15:57
Mar 5, 2014 at 8:25 answer added idiotprogrammer timeline score: 1
S Mar 4, 2014 at 13:53 history suggested MCW CC BY-SA 3.0
As someone said, the question is important, but we don't want to get tangled up in legal specificities. Copyright is international, interpretation is local.
Mar 4, 2014 at 13:40 review Suggested edits
S Mar 4, 2014 at 13:53
Mar 4, 2014 at 5:42 answer added Velda timeline score: 0
Mar 4, 2014 at 2:14 answer added Rachel timeline score: 2
Feb 12, 2014 at 12:20 answer added user2428118 timeline score: 4
Feb 11, 2014 at 8:08 review Suggested edits
Feb 11, 2014 at 11:05
Jan 8, 2014 at 3:15 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackEbooks/status/420755690190536704
Dec 28, 2013 at 14:18 vote accept James Jenkins
Dec 25, 2013 at 11:04 comment added Standback I think pure ethical discussion would not work well here. I suppose we could have one canonical post presenting common takes on the digital-piracy issue, but if ethical debates are generally protected, they could come up all over the place, in any question about copying, conversion, or distribution.
Dec 25, 2013 at 5:05 answer added Standback timeline score: 10
Dec 24, 2013 at 21:03 history reopened palacsint
Chad
James Jenkins
ricmarques
Anthon
Dec 24, 2013 at 20:43 comment added user43 If the book is available for free, it would be logical to assume you can redistribite it. In any case, it depends on your legal system not on the wishlist text given by the distribitor.
Dec 24, 2013 at 18:34 comment added Chad I think this question is "OK" because the answer is pretty straight forward and easily addressed. Just because a question might fit a close reason does not mean that it should be closed. If we close everything that could be closed we will end up in a situation where no one posts anything and the site will be closed.
Dec 24, 2013 at 18:29 review Reopen votes
Dec 24, 2013 at 21:03
Dec 24, 2013 at 17:54 comment added James Jenkins @DVK, I was thinking the OK, covered both the legal and ethical views, I think both apply in this case. Chads answer seems to address both also.
Dec 24, 2013 at 17:50 comment added DVK BTW, some of the close votes MAY have been because you used the completely undefined term "OK". OK from legal standpoint? Ethical? (e.g. it may be ethically wrong but you won't be prosecutable).
Dec 24, 2013 at 17:46 answer added mau timeline score: 8
Dec 24, 2013 at 17:45 history closed DᴀʀᴛʜVᴀᴅᴇʀ
user26
Flyk
e-sushi
DVK
Needs more focus
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:49 answer added DᴀʀᴛʜVᴀᴅᴇʀ timeline score: 3
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:46 comment added James Jenkins @Matt_2.0 we have two answers that address the source and the licensing. Of the two so far I think Chad, has covered pretty much all the variables in his answer. Without a more detailed source in the question.
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:45 comment added Jason Down I think in this case, even though the question is broad, we don't need to have 20 versions of the same question. I downloaded this book from somebooksite.com and it has license abc. Can I give a copy to my friend? Essentially, the important question is: Does DRM-Free mean copyright-free?. Answer: No. Heed the license.
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:31 review Close votes
Dec 24, 2013 at 17:48
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:21 answer added Chad timeline score: 32
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:13 answer added Jason Down timeline score: 22
Dec 24, 2013 at 16:12 comment added DᴀʀᴛʜVᴀᴅᴇʀ This question is hard to answer because it depends on what the terms or usage are from where you got it. So.. What does the terms of use say from the site you obtained the ebook?
Dec 24, 2013 at 15:50 history asked James Jenkins CC BY-SA 3.0